In
my previous blog entry, I dissected some obvious flaws in the new Podtrac
monthly ranking of a top 10 podcasts. Since then, it’s been found that there
are several respected podcast groups, including The Ringer, Earwolf and Maximum
Fun in the comedy and culture genres, as well as CNN news podcasts, that are
not being evaluated or considered for inclusion in the ranking. Apparently
Podtrac chooses what podcasters to include in their sampling, or maybe the
podcaster have to respond to their inquiries.
So,
what are the alternatives? There’s the Stitcher top 100 podcast list. Although
that list seems like a more relevant cross-section of podcasts that people are
talking about, it does not disclose its methodology or what the rankings are
based on. Stitcher does have two other top 100 lists where some indication of
their methods is given – one for “top movers,” which have risen the most in
Stitcher’s rankings. But you can’t see the full rankings, and many of these top
movers do not appear in the overall top 100 list. Lastly, Stitcher also has a
top 100 for the “most shared” podcasts, which looks more similar to the overall
top 100. Overall, the assumption is that the Stitcher top 100 lists are all
based on – and only based on – what is being heard through Stitcher’s app,
which discounts all the other distribution methods available.
Another
ranking, iTunesCharts.net, inspires more confidence. iTunesCharts.net operates
by culling Apple’s published iTunes rankings of podcasts at the end of each day.
Apple’s rankings are fluid and can change in real time – and Apple does not
publish past ranking data, so iTunesCharts.net’s records are the only available
history. The major attribute of iTunesCharts.net is that its measurement is
based on a more universal means of podcast, so its rankings are likely more
representative of the listener following that podcasts on its list actually
have.
At
this relatively early stage in the development of the podcasting industry,
without a truly universally accepted standard for measuring the listenership of
podcasts or ranking their popularity, the best any observer may be able to do
is choose a ranking that feels like it has “truthiness” (the Stephen
Colbert-coined word for something that most seems like it is true, even if
might not be completely true). So, for now, iTunesCharts.net has the truthiness
crown.
No comments:
Post a Comment